Controversy Erupts Over “White Party” Organized in Sri Lanka

An event in Sri Lanka dubbed the “white party” has stirred up a storm of controversy and condemnation after its advertisement sparked outrage online. The event, which mandated a white dress code, also included the line “Face control: White,” leading many to interpret it as an exclusionary measure targeting non-white attendees.

Following the backlash, the organizer issued an apology, acknowledging the event as “a bad idea” and emphasizing its intention to unite expatriates. However, the damage was done, prompting the cancellation of the party scheduled for last Saturday.

Social media erupted with criticism, denouncing the event as “disgusting” and “racist.” Local voices condemned the perceived discrimination, with one restaurant owner expressing the need for swift action against such practices.

Amidst the uproar, the event organizer, posting on Instagram under the handle geo_ecstatic, defended the party’s intent, claiming innocence of malice or racism. Nevertheless, the individual faced a barrage of abuse and threats, eventually departing the country.

The planned venue, Sarayka Lounge in Unawatuna, distanced itself from the controversy, announcing the event’s cancellation and severing ties with the organizers. In a statement, they affirmed their stance against racism and emphasized their commitment to inclusivity.

Notably, both the organizer and the owners of Sarayka Lounge are reported to be Russian citizens. The growing presence of Russians in Unawatuna, sometimes referred to as “Little Moscow,” has drawn attention, particularly as tensions surrounding the event unfolded.

Responding to the incident, the Russian Embassy in Colombo condemned racial discrimination and nationalism, urging Russian citizens in Sri Lanka to abide by local laws and customs.

In a related development, Sri Lanka announced the termination of long-term tourist visa extensions for Russians and Ukrainians, reportedly in response to increased arrivals since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. However, this decision drew criticism for its lack of Cabinet approval.